Bruce Philpott’s Oral Communications Presentation to the Glendale City Council on 12-02-08 Regarding the 2009 Budget

 

As we face tough budget decisions and more reductions in services, residents want to know, “How did we get into this situation?” There are many reasons, but I will focus on just one this evening.

 

Because employee costs account for more than 80% of a city’s budget, payroll represents the single largest cost factor.

 

With that in mind, between 2001 and 2007, 197 new full-time city employees were added to the workforce, a 13% increase. I should note that the number of hourly employees has remained fairly static at around 500 per year and their costs are not factored in here.  The number of full time employees was 1692 in 2001 and 1885 in 2007. While payroll increased by 13%, the population of Glendale only grew by 3%, from 200,000 to 206,000.

 

A fluctuation of 3%, up or down, in the general population is normally absorbed in a municipality like Glendale. That kind of fluctuation should not significantly impact services or programs. But an increase in the workforce of 13% adds roughly $30 million to the expenditure side of the budget.

 

Last year the city spent $55 million more than it took in. According to your revised budget numbers for this fiscal year that are found on page 3, and again on page 7, of the staff report, the city is projected to spend $88 million more that it will take in.

 

If your financial projections hold for this fiscal year, the city will post a combined deficit spending of $285 million since 2002.

 

Presented by:

 

Bruce Philpott

1418 Western Ave

Glendale, CA 91201

818.240.8949

brcphilpott1@aol.com